Contents

FEATURES

Current Highlights

Rumors & Innuendo

Depth Chart

Roster

Player Evaluations

2009 DRAFT ISSUE

Draft Summary Page

OTHER TOPICS

History of the Cardinals

About the Big Red Sheet

Welcome From the Editor

About the Editor

Memory of a True Card Fan

Order Cardinal Tickets

Links to  Cardinal Related Sites

 

2011 Regular Season
STEELERS @ CARDINALS PREVIEW

  • When: Sun. 10/30 1:05 pm ET

  • Televised: Sun. 10/30 1:05 pm ET  (DirecTV Sunday Ticket Ch.  711)

  • Satellite Radio: Sun. 10/30 1:05 pm ET   (SIRIUS Radio - Ch. 139)

Setup
Overview

Steelers' Last Game
Meet the Steelers
Cardinals Roster
Steelers vs. Cardinals Matchups

 Setup:
Two weeks ago (before the Bye) and after reeling from 4 straight gut-wrenching losses, the entire Cardinal team fell apart in Minnesota, falling behind 28 - 0 before the 1Q was even over.  Question of the moment is: Will the Cardinals suck it up and turn their season around? Or will they continue to descend into the abyss. Meanwhile, the Steelers haven't been exactly setting the world on fire (and have displayed a range of performances ranging fron (a) getting blown out by the Ravens, blowing out the Seahawks and Tennessee and (c) winning couple of close ones and losing a close one en route to a 4 & 2 record. They got blown out by Baltimore in Week 1 but shut out Seattle 24 - 0 in Week 2 , beat Indy by a FG in Week 3, lost to Houston by by a TD in Week 4, clobbered Tennesssee 38 - 17 in Week 5 and eked out a win over the Jags a week ago,  17 - 13. Based on their records, personnel and their level of play, you can only conclude that the Cardinals have their work cut out for them.

 Overview
I'm working with Pro Football Focus (PFF) rating numbers. Any postitive rating of more than +2.0 is pretty good. Anything less than a minus-2.0 rating is not-so-hot. Anything more than plus or minus 1.0 is enough of a departure from average to be worth noting. 

OFFENSE
More of a power running game than in the past (perhaps due to shaky pass pro) but Roethlisberger will still take his  shots deep to Wallace, Ward and Miller and Mendenhall is capable of turning a short-gain into a home run.

DEFENSE
Solid Front Seven but the secondary around Polamalu is a bit shaky in coverage and potentially vulnerable.

SPECIAL TEAMS
Solid kicking and punting. Don't know much about the Steeler return game.

 Steelers Last Game
They built up an early lead and  played old fashioned, close-to-the-vest AFC North smashmouth football en route to a  17 to 13 over Jacksonville. A strong running game, a stifling defense and timely sacks punctuated by an occasional long-gainer (both in the air and on the ground) helped determine the outcome. The only thing that kept the score relatively low and close were the number of penalties picked up by the Steelers.

Game summary:

First Quarter

  • Jax started on their own 20 and pecked their way to the Steeler 42 (with no gain over 11 yards). But Woodley's sack of Gabbert stalled the drive and they punted to the Steeler 13. A mixture of runs and short passes set up a 32 yard catch and run by Sanders and, 2 plays later, an 8-yard Mendenhall TD run. Steelers 7 - Jags 0.

  • Jags returned the KO to their own 31 but went 3 & out (set up by another sack of Gabbert; this time by Keisel.  Steelers moved from their own 28 to the Jaguar 40 as the quarter ended. 1st Quarter Score: Steelers 7 - Jags 0.

Second Quarter

  • Three plays later, Roethlisberger hit Wallace for a 28-yard TD. Steelers 14 - Jags 0.

  • Jacksonville started from their own 28 and went 3 & out. Steelers returned the punt to their own 28. A 68-yard burst up the middle by Mendhall (with a face mask penalty tacked on) got the Steelers to the Jag 2, where they were unable to put it in and settled for a 21 yard Suisham field goal. Steelers 17 - Jags 0.

  •  Starting from their own 25, Gabbert managed to lead his team in 6 plays (aided by two Steeler defensive penalties) to the Steeler 24-yard line, but another Woodley Sack (this time for minus-4) forced a 46-yard Jag field goal. Steelers 17 - Jags 3.

  •  A 48-yard completion from Roethlisberger to Wallace moved the Steelers to the Jag 31, but a couple of Steeler penalties stalled the drive and Suisham's 46-yard attempt was wide left. Jags took over on their own 36 with 4:05  to go. But Farrior's sack of Gabbert made the Jags go 3 & out. Steelers managed to move from their own 12 to their own 35 before punting. Jags started from their own 22 and went 3 & out. Pittsburgh ran out the clock.  Halftime Score - Steelers 17 - Jags 3.

Third Quarter

  • Steelers returned the Kickoff to their own 25 and stayed mostly on the ground before punting from the Jax 45. Jags took over on their own 20. They ran Jones-Drew 3 times in a row and ran off 17 plays before Gabbert hit Hill from the 18 for a TD. The score narrows. Steelers 17 - Jags 10.

  •   Pittsburgh moved from their own 20 to their own 35 as the quarter ended. 3rd Quarter Score: Steelers 17 - Jags 10.

Fourth Quarter

  • Pittsburgh sputtered and punted. Jags got the ball back on their own 17 but went 3 & out. Steelers fair-caught the punt at their own 33. A penalty and a sack forced them to go 3 & out. Jags also went 3 & out and punted from their own 30. Another sack of Roethlisberger forced Pitts to into another 3 & out.

  • 7:13 left. Jags started from their own 48 and moved to the Pittsburgh 25 where the drive stalled and they settled for a 45-yard Scobee FG. Jags are within 4. Steelers 17 - Jags 13.

  • 4:17 left. Steelers ate up all but 1:01 as they moved from 20 to their own 37 before punting. Jags took over on their own 23 but were unable to get past tthe Pitt 48 as the gun sounded,.  Final Score: Steelers 17 - Jags 13.

 Meet the Steelers
On paper, the Vikings are a lot better than 0 & 4. We're not sure what's caused the wheels to come off the wagon, but then again, the Cardinals are following a similar hard-to-fathom pattern.

  Quarterbacks
07 Roethlisberger, Ben QB 6-5 241 29 8 Miami (Ohio) Snaps: 398. Pluses: Overall: +12.6. Passing: +10.5. Rushing: +2.5. Minuses: None.
16 Batch, Charlie QB 6-2 216 36 14 Eastern Michigan  Snaps: 2. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
10 Dixon, Dennis QB 6-3 209 26 4 Oregon Snaps: Pluses: Minuses:

Evaluation
Roethlisberger's two most endearing qualities are (1) he makes big plays at big moments and (2) prospective sackers bounce off him (& then he invariably turns those into big plays. Batch is a seasoned veteran. Dixon is an athletic #3.

  Running Backs

34 Mendenhall, Rashard RB 5-10 225 24 4 Illinois Snaps: 144. Pluses: None.  Minuses: Overall: -1.4. Rush: -1.2.
33 Redman, Isaac RB 6-0 230 26 3 Bowie State Snaps: 135. Pluses: Overall; +5.4. Rush: +4.0. Minuses: None.
21 Moore, Mewelde RB 5-11 209 29 8 Tulane Snaps: 42. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
27 Dwyer, Jonathan RB 5-11 229 22 2 Georgia Tech Snaps: 21. Pluses: None,. Minuses: None.

Evaluation
PMendenhall has shaken off early injuries and has emerged as a steady 100+ yard force. He had a 66-yarder up the middle last week so you know he can hit home runs. Redman is a capable backup. Moore is experienced and terrific catching out of the backfield.

 Wide Receivers


86 Ward, Hines WR 6-0 205 35 14 Georgia Snaps: 334. Pluses: Overall: +21.1. Minuses: None.
84 Brown, Antonio WR 5-10 186 23 2 Central Michigan Snaps: 182. Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -1.1. Penalty: -1.4
89 Cotchery, Jerricho WR 6-0 203 29 8 North Carolina State Snaps: 7. Pluses: None,. Minuses: None.
17 Wallace, Mike WR 6-0 199 25 3 Mississippi Snaps: 330. Pluses: Overall: +10.0. Rec.+10.6. Minuses: None.
88 Sanders, Emmanuel WR 5-11 180 24 2 SMU Snaps: 158. Pluses: Overall: +2.2. Rec: +1.6. Minuses: None.
81 Battle, Arnaz WR 6-1 208 31 9 Notre Dame Snaps: 4. Pluses: None. Minuses: None,

 

Evaluation
Wallace has emerged as a very dangerous big play long-ball threat. Ward can run great routes, get open, catch and block. As much as we all loved Q, Ward kind of represented the gold standard we all expected Boldin to attain.

Tight Ends
83 Miller, Heath TE 6-5 256 28 7 Virginia Snaps: 375. Pluses: Overall: +2.0. Run Block: +2.0. Penalty:+1.7. Minuses: None.
85 Johnson, David TE/FB 6-2 260 24 3 Arkansas State Snaps: 181. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
82 Saunders, Weslye TE 6-5 270 22 R South Carolina Snaps: 81. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.

Evaluation
Miller is excellent; standing out especially as a run blocker.

Offensive Line
72 Scott, Jonathan LT 6-6 318 28 5 Texas Snaps: 313. Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -16.3. Pass Bl: -6.7. Run Bl: -6.5. Penalty: 3.1.
78 Starks, Max T 6-8 345 29 8 Florida Snaps: 129. Pluses: Overall: +2.9. Run Bl: +2.3.Minuses:
69 Meredith, Jamon OT 6-5 304 25 3 South CarolinaSnaps: 0. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
68 Kemoeatu, Chris LG 6-3 344 28 7 Utah Snaps: 199. Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -6.1. Pass Bl: -3.5. Run Bl: -3.5.
73 Foster, Ramon T 6-6 325 25 3 Tennessee Snaps: 281. Pluses: Overall: +1.9. Run Bl: +2.2. Penalty: +1.3. Minuses: Pass Bl: -1.6.

53 Pouncey, Maurkice C/G 6-4 304 22 2 Florida Snaps: 394. Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -5.6. Pass Block: -2.3. Run Block: -2.0. Penalty: -1.3.
79 Essex, Trai G 6-5 324 28 7 Northwestern Snaps: 149. Pluses: None. Minuses: -7.0. Pass Bl: -7.0.
64 Legursky, Doug RG/C 6-1 315 25 3 Marshall Snaps: 272. Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -1.8. Run Bl: -2.7.
77 Gilbert, Marcus RT 6-6 330 23 R Florida Snaps: 203. Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -1.5. Pass Bl: -1.9.


Evaluation :
They evidently help implement the Steeler power running game flawlessly, but weak PFF ratings overall don't support this




Defensive Line


91 Smith, Aaron LDE 6-5 298 35 13 Northern Colorado Snaps: 175. Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -5.6. Run D: -2.9. Pass Rush: -2.8.
96 Hood, Ziggy DE 6-3 300 24 3 Missouri Snaps: 275. Pluses: Pen: +1.3.  Minuses: Overall: -5.7. Run Def: -3.5. Pass Rush: -3.5
98 Hampton, Casey NT 6-1 325 34 11 Texas Snaps: 134. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
76 Hoke, Chris NT 6-2 305 35 10 Brigham Young Snaps: 61. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
90 McLendon, Steve DT 6-4 280 25 2 Troy Snaps: 51. Pluses: Overall: +2.5. Run Def: +1.2. Pass Rush: +1.1. Minuses: None.
99 Keisel, Brett RDE 6-5 285 33 10 Brigham Young Snaps: 198. Pluses: Overall: +7.7. Run Def: +1.1. Pass Rush: +4.7. Minuses: None.
97 Heyward, Cameron DE 6-5 288 22 R Ohio State Snaps: 73. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.

Evaluation :
If you want to be an old school power running-based  team, you'd bettere be physical up front and the Steelers appear to have the horses to do just that.

 Linebacker
56 Woodley, LaMarr LOLB 6-2 265 26 5 Michigan Snaps: 367. Pluses: Run Def: +4.3. Minuses: Pass Cov: -2.4. Pen: -1.4.
54 Carter, Chris LB 6-1 248 22 R Fresno State Snaps: Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
51 Farrior, James LILB 6-2 243 36 15 Virginia Snaps: Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -3.9. Run Def: -4.2.
55 Sylvester, Stevenson ILB 6-2 231 23 2 Utah Snaps: Pluses: None. Minuses: None.

94 Timmons, Lawrence RLB 6-1 234 25 5 Florida State Snaps: 375. Pluses: Pass Cov: +3.2. Minuses: Overall: -3.5. Run Def: -1.6. Pass Rush: -5.7.
50 Foote, Larry LB 6-1 239 31 10 Michigan Snaps: 146. Pluses: Pass Rush: +1.4. Minuses: Overall: -3.4. Run Def: -3.5. Pass Cov: -1.5.
92 Harrison, James ROLB 6-0 242 33 8 Kent State Snaps: 221. Pluses: Overall: +14.7. Run Def: +6.8. Pass Rush: +6.4. Pass Cov: +1.1. Minuses: None.
93 Worilds, Jason OLB 6-2 262 23 2 Virginia Tech Snaps: 17. Pluses: Minuses:

Evaluation
Check out Dick LeBeau's OLB configuration - 2 big guys (Woodley at 265 lbs and Harrison at 242 lbs) surrounding somewhat smaller ILBs in Farrior and Timmons. All of these guys can get after the QB.

 Secondary
20 McFadden, Bryant LCB 6-0 190 29 7 Florida State Snaps: 53.  Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
23 Lewis, Keenan CB 6-0 208 25 3 Oregon State Snaps: 154. Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -1.9. Pass Cov: -1.6.
31 Brown, Curtis DB 6-0 185 23 R Texas Snaps: 0. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
25 Clark, Ryan FS 5-11 205 32 10 Louisiana State Snaps: 378. Pluses: None. Minuses: Overall: -1.4.
29 Mundy, Ryan FS 6-1 209 26 3 West Virginia Snaps: 81. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
43 Polamalu, Troy SS 5-10 207 30 9 USC Snaps: 369. Pluses: Overall: +10.2. Run Def: +1.5. Pass Rush: +3.8. Pass Cov: +5.8. Minuses: None.
26 Allen, Will S 6-1 200 29 8 Ohio State Snaps: Pluses: None. Minuses: None.
24 Taylor, Ike RCB 6-2 195 31 9 Louisiana-Lafayette Snaps: 374. Pluses: Overall: +1.8. Run Def: +1.6. Pass Cov: +1.4. Minuses: None.
22 Gay, William CB 5-10 190 26 5 Louisville Snaps: 340. Pluses: Penalty: +1.4. Minuses: Pass Cov: -2.6.
28 Allen, Cortez DB 6-1 196 22 R The Citadel Snaps: 3. Pluses: None. Minuses: None.


Evaluation:
The presence of "Superman" (Polamalu) may be the only thing that keeps this unit from being consideredthe major Achilles.Heel of the Pittsburgh defense.


 Special Teams
06 Suisham, Shaun K 6-0 200 29 7 Bowling Green State
09 Sepulveda, Daniel P/H 6-3 230 27 4 Baylor
60 Warren, Greg LS 6-3 252 30 7 North Carolina
84 Brown, Antonio KR/PR/WR 5-10 186 23 2 Central Michigan

Evaluation:
Suisham and Sepulveda are superb at what they do. I don't know much about Brown.

 Coaches
Mike Tomlin Head Coach
Bruce Arians Offensive Coordinator
Dick LeBeau Defensive Coordinator
Al Everest Special Teams Coordinator


Evaluation:

FTomlin's been around long enough to have put his stamp on the personality of this team, which to me is: a physically and mentally tough "old school" squad that plays things fairly close to its vest and uses this to take a few opportunistic big play shots during the course of any game. LeBeau is the master of the zone blitz. Everest was a Cardinal ST coach back in the day.



Cardinal Roster
PFFW hadn't provided updated Week 4 stats as we post this preview, which means the rating info will be "one week stale."

QB - 4 Kolb, 19 Skelton,  02 Bartel

Kolb (Overall Rating of +4.6 and Passer Rating of 5.5) started off the season performing as though he had more than met his coaches' expectations; but his production has tailed off of late - most probably because he's being undermined by inferior offensive line play. He's deadly in the short game when he gets his rhythm early and is adept at play action fakes, rollouts and waggles; however I've noticed of late that he is not connecting with receivers when throwing on the run (possibly due to the lack of communication with his receivers or their inability to break off their route and get free).

Skelton has a world of athletic talent and just needs more work, but his development has been hampered by a high ankle sprain. Surprise of preseason was Bartel (who proved  extremely accurate and shares Kolb's poise in the pocket
. Some concern about Bartel's tendency to lose concentration and make one or two major miscues per game that costs his team points or field position.

RB - 26, Wells,  36 Stephens-Howling  (KR/PR), 29 C Taylor, 46 A. Smith
Wells seems to be emerging as the dominant big breakaway back everyone expected him to be when he was drafted. But his struggles in the passing game (a minus-3.4 rating which contributes to his minus-2.4 overall rating) has hurt us offensively. He does have a +3.0 rating as a rusher. Backup RB Alfonso Smith has a+1.1. Chester Taylor hasn't been around enough to make much of an impact. 


FB - 35 Sherman

A rookie who was good enough to win a roster battle over Mau'ia. Main role figures to be as lead blocker, but Kolb and Bartel like to spread the ball around, and they did complete 2 passes to him vs. the Gints.

WR - 85 Doucet , 12 Roberts, 17 Stuckey,
WR -11 Fitzgerald, 14 S Williams, 89 Sampson
Overall production is lower than it should be (possibly due to problems experienced by Kolb as the result of our O-line's ability to protect him (See how everything is interrelated)?

Fitz has an overall rating of +5.8 (+4.3 as a receiver). But Roberts (minus-5.4 as a receiver, minus-2.4 as a run blocker and minus-8.0 overall and Stuckey (minus-2.2 as a receiver/minus-2.1 overall) has dragged down the overall production of the unit. Doucet, however (+1.5 as a receiver) is beginning to emerge as Fitz's #2.

TE - 86 Heap, 87 King,  84 Housler, 81 Dray
Totally revamped position. Heap is one of the best all-around TE's in football. He enjoys a + 4.8 overall rating/+4.2 as a run blocker. Former Panther King - brought in primarily for his run blocking is rated +1.5 overall and 2.7 as a receiver. His only apparent deficiency is as a pass blocker (minus-1.9).  Housler has sub 4.6 speed, great hands and can stretch the field but has only been in for 47 snaps. Cards liked Dray enough to cut Spach and still go with 4 TE's on their Final 53 roster.

LT- 75 L Brown
, 73 Bridges
LG-
71 Colledge,  
OC-
63Sendlein
RG- 70 Hadnot (C), 76 Lutui
RT 
72 Keith,  74 Batiste
This unit is killing us. We've got huge problems at tackle - Check out these overall ratings: L Brown: minus-20.8; Colledge: minus-4.2; Sendlein: +0.2; Hadnot: +11.9; Keith: Minus-11.9; Bridges: minus-5.1. Of our five starting linemen, only Hadnot has good numbers.

Brown (-17.4), Colledge (-4.7) and Keith (-9.4) are butt-awful as pass blockers. Brown (-3.0), Keith (-2.9) and Bridges (-3.2) are just "fairly bad" as run blockers. Call it what you will (poor communication, lack of jelling or whatever). Poor O-line play is dragging down the rest of the team.

DE - 93 Campbell, 98 Eason
NT - 92 D Williams, 79 Carter
DT - 90 Dockett, 91 Holliday
Campbell is solid across the board with the exception of stopping the run. He leads the team in tackles. Docket has no negatives but his main strength is as a pass rusher. Both Calais and DDock have good pass coverage ratings; mainly because of their skill at batting down passes. Williams' strength is primarily as a run-stopper, but he tires quickly and only plays 1/3 to 1/4 the snaps played by Campbell and Dockett . His backups (Carter and Eason) have negative ratings vs. the run). Holliday has been a godsend - especially as an inside pass rusher.

WLB - 55 Porter, 50 Schofield
ILB  51 Lenon, 52 Bradley
ILB- 558 D Washington,
56 Walker,
SLB - 53 Haggans, 94 Acho
This unit has pretty good ratings overall. Lenon, Haggans, Washington and Schofield all have overall ratings in the positive-range. But at least statisticly, Porter has been a disaster (Overall Rating: minus-9.5; +1.0 vs.the run; minus-7.4 as a pass rusher and minus-1.6 in pass coverage and minus-1.5 in coverage.  (& minus-1.5 in being penalized).

Haggans (+5.4) is our best pass rusher followed by Washington (+3.0) and Schofield (+2.4). Walker and Acho are both minus-1.1 vs, the run.

Lenon and Washington follow Campbell in most tackles. Haggans blows away the rest of the team in QB Pressures with 15 (Lenon is second with 6).

Buzz is that we should begin to see more and more of Schofield (& possibly Acho) and less of Porter (who tends to wear down late in games).

RCB - 21 Peterson, 31 Marshall
LCB- 20 Jefferson, 27 Adams, 32 Lindsay   
SS-
  24 Wilson,
  41 Abdullah,
40 Tillman
FS- 25 Rhodes,  
49 Rash Johnson, 37 Celestine
Jefferson is the surprise leader of the secondary with an overall rating of +5.1 followed by A-Dub with +3.6. Everyone else is in the minus category overall. Key point of weakness is at the corner position opposite Jefferson where rookie Patrick Peterson (minus-5.0 overall) is repeatedly being taken to school. How quickly this unit comes together to play well as a unit will depend on how quickly Peterson comes along.

The Cardinals will be challenged at FS where Kerry Rhodes has been sidelined by surgery. It will be up to Rashad Johnson and newly signed Celestine to step up and fill the void left by Rhodes. As run defenders, Jefferson (+3.6) and Wilson (+4.1) have been holding down the fort.

K-04 Feely
P-  09 Zastudil

H - 09 Zastudil
LS-
82 Leach
KR -
37Stephens-Howling, 20 Jefferson
PR
- 21 Peterson
The usually solid Feely  has been a bit inconsistent. Zastudil (who had mediocre numbers a s apunter) has been in and out due to injury. Peterson and the Howler are both serious home run threats.

  Steelers vs. Cardinals Matchups

Pittsburgh Passing Attack vs. Cardinal Pass Defense
Roethlisberger to Ward, Wallace and Miller (with Mendenhall out of the backfield) will present a challenge to the somewhat inexperienced and porous Cardinal secondary. Wallace is the burner. Cardinal DB's have been notorious for letting guys beat them deep. But the Steelers do have a glaring weakness at virtually every position along their offensive line - especially on Roethlisberger's blind side. In terms of overall effectiveness, the Steelers have a +15.0 rating (compared to 7.0 for the Cardinals. 

Steelers throw 59% of their passes inside the hash marks and throw outside 22% to their right and 19% to their left. They're most effective throwing up the middle between 10 and 19 yards. They're more effective throwing deep to their left and less effective throwing deep to their right. For standard of comparison, they're more effective than the Cardinals throwing to backs and receivers behind the line of scrimmage.

Key to putting pressure on Roethlisberger will be to wrap up and sustain tackles (i.e. don't bounce off him) and protect outside contain and other Big Ben escape hatches. Cards have been traditionally vulnerable to deep passes to the left (a Steeler strong point) so Petersonand the FS had better keep on their toes. Both coaching staffs know one another well and we should witness an Arians vs. Horton chess match.

Pittsburgh Running Attack vs. Cardinal Run Defense
The run game is a Steeler strength. The Cards have proved they can stop the run (when they want to) but have been inconsistent from game to game and below-average overall. Cards have to apply "Gore Rules" to Mendenhall (who broke one up the middle for 66-yards last week).

Steelers ran 42% of their plays off right tackle/around end. (compared to 17% off left tackle/around end). They ran 28% of their pl;ays inside the guards. Stands to reason, therefore, that Pittsburgh posted a gaudy 9.5 yards per carry off RT and 3.9 around RE (compared to 1.9 YPC around left end. 2.4 and 0.7 YPC middle-left and middle-right).)

The left side of our Front Seven (especially Campbell, Williams, Haggans and Lenon - with an assist from Dockett, Washington and A-Dub had better fasten their chin-straps.

Cardinal Passing Attack vs. Pittsburgh Pass Defense
Kolb started off on-plan/on-time but seems to have fallen off the track in his most recent games. His struggles may have more to do with poor pass protection than Kolb himself, but he'll have to play better if we're to right the ship. Opposing teams have had some success isolating Fitzgerald and making Roberts, Stuckey and Doucet beat them. So far, Roberts and Stuckey have been struggling, but Doucet is beginning to emerge as our #2 guy. Cardinal TE's are emerging as a safety-net for Kolb, but we're not getting similar production in the receiving game from Beanie Wells (who has a negative rating of -3.4 as a receiver). LSH (& we expect Taylor more and more) usually are used in passing situations.

55% of Cardinal passes are inside the hash marks, with most of them from 0 to 19 yards. They throw to their right 28% of the time (compared to 19% to the left). The Cards struggle a bit throwing behind the line of scrimmage. They do best throwing outside the hash marks. When going deep, we do a bit better throwing to our right.

With the exception of the high-impact Polamalu, Pittsburgh's secondary is suspect and (if we can protect Kolb) vulnerable. But our O-line's ability to stave off Woodley, Harrison, Farrior and Keisel will be key (and a real challenge).

Cardinal Running Attack vs. Pittsburgh Run Defense
Beanie is beginning to look like a steady 100+ yard ground gainer. It will be interesting to see if Beanie retains his mojo and the O-line sustains its run-blocking momentum after the Bye Week.

Cards run inside the guards 43.5% of the time. We (try to) run outside LE 20% of the time compared to 13% running around RE. We're most effective running up the middle inside LG averaging 8.1 yards a pop. We're weakest running off RT (2.7 YPC) but average well over 3.2 YPC everywhere else.

The left side of the Steeler D-line has been surprisingly soft vs. the run. Steeler OLB's (Woodley and Harrison) rate strong vs. the run. Their inside LB's are both rated in the negative; suggesting that we may want to pound Beanie inside the tackles rather than repeatedly test the Pittsburgh outside perimeter.

Special Teams
Suisham and Sepulvida look more reliable than have Feely and Zastidl in the kicking and punting game. I don't know anything about Antonio Brown, but I do know Peterson and LSH are capable of breaking something long at any time.

Coaching
Lots of "incest." Tomlin brings youth and street creds to the head coaching position. LeBeau is the grand-master of the Steeler defense (Horton's main influence). Arians succeeded Wiz as the Steeler offensive brain.

Final Word
On paper, the Steelers are better than the Cards, but they've had their struggles in a couple of games. Cardinals are desperate. This game in a real sense figures to represent a measuring stick and gut-check of the team's resiliency. I'd really like to see what the Cards will look like when everyone brings their "A" Game and continues to bring  it for an entire 60-minutes.

The Big Red Sheet web site is not the official web site nor do we represent the official views of the Arizona Cardinals Football Club or National Football League. We are a forum for various input and opinions from a broad variety of sources, and our content will most likely will be a combination of fact, opinion and hearsay. While we will take reasonable precautions to avoid inaccuracies or misstatements and will issue corrections or retractions if warranted, we will not assume responsibility for the type of minor unintentional inaccuracies that are a natural part of web site publishing.

Click here with questions or comments about the Cardinals or this web site.

Copyright © 1996 Gollin & Associates. Last modified: 10/20/2011